Serving this collection was an eye-opening opportunity for me to look at collections of art from a different angle. We’re inspired to make art and be creative depending on our singular view of an artwork, and this sticks us to the surface. In other words, if one looks at a body of work collectively, the difference that it makes is that it takes you to the depths of the creative world. This archiving experience made me ask questions such as: why does an artist choose to create art in collections and not in singular pieces, and why does Khayat have so many various forms to express one message? These questions were provoking me to overthink my creativity and to see the difference, I had to create differently: collective works versus individual works.

It’s hard to look through a good archive and not have certain sensations rise; we are experiencing it. One can gain insight into Khayat’s art by experiencing his body of work; moreover, one can investigate the cultural significance and the periods of Kurdish art during that specific era, which Khayat worked in, and this is only possible with the existing archive. Since there wasn’t a culture of preserving heritage and documenting great works, many parts of Kurdish history, especially our cultural and artistic sides, are missing.

Here, Kashkul comes in. With the authentic agenda of finding that creative aspect and preserving what is present, a great project such as The Visual Archive is born with a handful of visionary young hearts who are aware of what they’re doing and of the importance of their work. Kashkul’s creative space has been a formative guide in learning the process of making archives and in continually rediscovering what becomes possible with their products, with how personal and impactful these collections can be. The collection doesn’t only hold the artwork, but such valuable words from the artists, interviews, and notes with the patience of the ants that build a city underground with single grains of dust. Every art piece’s description shows the given care and attention it deserves. Each piece in Khayat’s collection is a narrator of a story, of every individual who has faced injustice and grievance on our land. In most of his work, I see his take on the tragedies of the destructive fate of being Kurdish, we’ve grown up hearing about and continue to be its witness ourselves.

I came into this collection working on its metadata; I wasn’t there when the team worked with Khayat himself and created the archives in his presence. But now, the digital exhibitions take me back in thought, making me wonder how priceless it must have been to engage with an artist in the act of preserving every collection he produced in his lifetime—and what it must feel like, as an artist, to know that your works won’t fade into oblivion like those of many Kurdish artists, writers, and poets we’ve lost but will be preserved, studied, and lived for generations through this archiving project. Khayat collaborated with others throughout his life, and sharing his archive with Exeter University feels like a faithful acknowledgment of that collaborative spirit.
Nawa Amin | August 14th 2025
Slemani







